Consider the following facts:

FACT:  Obama admitted that his father was a Kenyan, a British subject.
FACT:  Obama’s mother was, for the sake of argument, a US citizen, of age. (She was in fact, a minor, incapable of transferring US citizenship on Obama, based on the law then.
FACT:  Both parents MUST be US citizens to confer US citizenship on a child AND the child MUST be born either in the US (native born) or on a US base OCONUS , i.e., McLame in a US Naval Hospital in the Canal Zone.
FACT:  Obama is thus a dual citizen. UK subject plus US citizen = Dual Nationality. This cannot be denied.
FACT:  Obama is an illegal President because he has dual citizenship and can never become a natural born citizen, simply because where one is born is a constant and cannot be changed, i.e., you may be born in California and live in Florida your whole life but the birth certificate will always reflect California.
FACT:  Nancy Pelosi aided and abetted the election of an illegal President by refusing to demand that he prove his citizenship in a valid format and thus, violated the Constitution.

Consider the following scenario.

A group of patriots now consider the Obama Regime to be completely lawless with the recent usurpation of the Senate’s Constitutional power to confirm appointees and decide to act.

a.  They observe that the Issa vs Holder Operation Fast and Furious sessions are little more than a dog and pony show.
b.  They observe that the SCOTUS has refused to even examine the case of Obama’s birth certificate in 2008, fearful of race riots and/or a Constitutional crisis that they would have to deal with.
c.  They observe that the ATF has acted unlawfully by enabling straw man buys in an operation that started under a Democrat controlled Congress.
d.  They observe that ObamaKare was passed by a Democrat controlled Congress and it has been stated by Federal Judge Henry E. Hudson that the Federal government has no power “to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market.”
e.  They observe that the US Government, led by a Democrat controlled Congress, is in clear violation of Article 4.4 which sets out in clear detail that the Federal government SHALL protect the separate states from invasion. Example: Arizona is under invasion by Mexican troops and illegals and vast tracts of US desert areas are trashed and considered either a biological hazard or a danger area due to criminal activity.
f.  They observe that offering 6 billion dollars for “clunkers” is in clear violation of Articles 1.2 and 1.8 of the US Constitution.
g.  They observe that Obama’s “czars” unlike in previous administrations, have cabinet-level authority, i.e., Cass Sunstein issuing regulations, without being vetted. That they are unelected policy and regulatory decision makers and this is in direct violation of Article 1.1 of the US Constitution that states only Congress can draft and enact laws.
h.  They observe that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi endorsed the unconstitutional Fairness Doctrine stating in reply to Human Events reporter John Gizzi’s question: “Do you personally support revival of the ‘Fairness Doctrine?”, she [Nancy] replied “Yes.”
.  They observe that the Democrat controlled Congress did nothing when Obama took over as the Chairman of the UN Security Council.
j.  They observe that the Democrat controlled Congress gave the 9/11 first responders money. This violates Article 1.8 of the US Constitution in that Congress can expend funds for the general welfare but not for individuals or special groups.
k.  They observe that the Democrat controlled Congress attempted to regulate freedom of speech through Net Neutrality.
l.  They observe that Nancy Pelosi is “glad” that President Obama violated the US Constitution, bypassing the Senate by appointing three people to the National Labor Relations Board and one to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
m.  They observe that the Congress, led by Nancy Pelosi, declared that Article 1.8 of the US Constitution fell under the purview of Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce. However, they noted, one cannot buy insurance across state lines and therefore, insurance is not interstate commerce. Thus Congress lied, again.
o.  They observe that ObamaKare violates the 10th Amendment because it coerces the separate states into complying with a Federal program that usurps state jurisdiction of the insurance industry within their states.

One day, Nancy Pelosi lands in her private jet and is escorted to her limo. She gets in. It pulls out, and the doors lock. A cell phone jammer is employed to keep her from calling out and the limo drives to a location not where she wanted to go. Henry Waxman also disappears.

A video appears on YouTube a week after the disappearance of Nancy Pelosi and Henry Waxman, uploaded from a public library terminal that was hacked into, showing their trial, for the above crimes against the American people, which occurred while Nancy was in charge of the Congress and Waxman voted for them. The video is in four parts, totaling six hours, with the judge and jury wearing masks. Pelosi defends herself but the evidence is overwhelming. She is sentenced to twenty-five years in a people’s prison and disappears from the face of the earth. All attempts to find her turn up nothing.

Henry Waxman faces an additional charge of Treason for aiding Code Pink in sending aid to the terrorists in Fallujah, in 2004, then engaged in battle against US Marines. He is sentenced to death by a firing squad and his corpse is dropped off in a body bag in the National Mall.

Barbara Boxer, Raul Grijalva, and Dennis Kucinich, all who helped Waxman in 2004, all surround themselves with more security.

Question: Is it okay to kidnap a traitor and try them and sentence them, using laws on the books as well as the US Constitution, by a people’s court, when there is no longer any rule of law in our government?

Question: If Obama, the leader of this nation, refuses to follow the Constitution, the Law of the Land, why are we bound to follow the law?

Question: If Eric Holder, the director of the DOJ routinely violates the law, commits perjury, destroys evidence, engaged in a subversion of the Constitution (Second Amendment), and refuses to prosecute crimes caught on video-tape, why are we bound to follow the law?

Question: If federal agencies like the ATF engage in a subversion of the Constitution (Second Amendment) and the TSA, who violates the 4th and 5th Amendments every day, do not follow the law of the land, why should we?



 The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.” T. Jefferson.

About Gunny G

I am a retired Marine and a warrior FOR the Constitution of the United States of America AS IT WAS WRITTEN not as the Liberals, Communists, Progressives, Statists, and Globalists WANT it to be. In fact, if you fall into those groups, you are the enemy of freedom and thus, my enemy. Consider yourself warned.
This entry was posted in ANTI-FASCIST, ANTI-LIBERAL, CORRUPTION, TYRANNY. Bookmark the permalink.


  1. Cheesy says:

    3goldens, another willing participant in giving up his countrymen in the hopes that the gestapo will kill him and his family last.
    Consult Sam Adams you freaking coward.
    Just found your site through Wirecutter’s – you be bookmarked!
    has anyone here read “unintended Consequences” or Vince Flynn’s “Term Limits”?
    Food for thought.

  2. Chris Mallory says:

    A bunch of cowards running star chambers while wearing masks are just as much enemies of the American people as the Feebs are.

    But then I am more like John Hancock. I sign my name where the king can read it without his glasses.

    • Gunny G says:

      Agreed. I registered this domain under my full name and address and stand by everything I write.

      The point of wearing masks in that essay was that it is okay for the Occutards to do so, with Obama’s (and the Dems) consent so why not for this? I enjoy hanging libs by their own petards, so to speak.

  3. Buck says:

    Gunny: Just emailed you a copy of “Weldon v Obama” which you will find interesting.

  4. Buck says:

    Wow! You mean the water’s starting to boil and the frog’s starting to jump a little?
    The Revolution was fought with a much more dedicated 33%.
    Somehow I just don’t see 33% of today’s Americans willing to put up with the kind of hardship and sacrifice as those of 1776.
    It’s easy to be a warm weather patriot. But what will most do when they wake up to learn their friend’s house was raided at 0300 by “law enforcement” in black jump suits, ski masks and battering the door down while supported by more black jump suits sitting back with high power, infra red scope just itching to “make a shot”???

    • Gunny G says:


      Maybe back East they’ll bend over but out West and down in the South? I don’t think so. Remember what happened whenteh Feds laid a seige on at the Montana militia? About 500 ARMED Americans showed up as “overwatch.” I would be that the number would be triple after three years of the Kenyan’s misrule.

    • Frankroy says:

      I don’t for one muinte believe it is a matter of competence. I believe these elected officials do it intentionally; and why shouldn’t they? On the one hand, they keep getting re-elected. On the other hand, our other branches of government do not intervene. And the really neat part, there really isn’t anything I, as an individual, can do about it. Eg: If I want to refuse to help other people, whom I do not even get to choose, purchase new vehicles under a program with a fancy name for their own personal benefit, I get my wages garnished. My employer won’t refuse to garnish my wages, out of fear of his own livelihood, etc. And if I want to press the issue further, maybe i’ll have tangible property taken away or even end up in jail. At what point do we stop calling this a democracy and start calling it an ochlocracy?

  5. 3goldens says:

    Lies & Distortions & Advocating Kidnaping, Violence, and you call yourselves patriots, there is a word that defines these actions it’s COWARDLY!

    Say what you will and I know right this very second the self righteous and ignorant on issues will stand up and take notice of these comments, because they are primarily invested in spreading further lies and deceiving folks into believing the mass conspiracy of the communist and socialist infiltration of this country. It’s as thigh Joe McCarthy had risen from the grave, yet I fear it’s worse because unfortunately and for some unknown reason people believe this crap, instead of picking up a dam book like the constitution they believe what some crack pot rights on a blog, probably in all likelihood financed by the Koch brothers, the billionaires who financed the entire Tea Party movement. Mcman you folks just don’t get it, these guys are the worst kind of scum you can ever imagine, am they want to stay in power and they want to stay rich above and beyond anything else, and you dummies soak it right up, sad sad sad!

    Put your independent thinking caps on people, rise up from these lying blog writing morons! Get your own information!

    A prime example!

    Lie # 1:
    NOT A FACT A OUTRIGHT LIE! Both parents MUST be US citizens to confer US citizenship on a child AND the child MUST be born either in the US (native born) or on a US base OCONUS , i.e., McLame in a US Naval Hospital in the Canal Zone.

    DISTORTION # 2: j.  They observe that the Democrat controlled Congress gave the 9/11 first responders money. This violates Article 1.8 of the US Constitution in that Congress can expend funds for the general welfare but not for individuals or special groups.

    And your congress gave nothing, nothing to the health care needs of the first responders of the Deepwater Horizon disaster brought upon this government by yet another foreign government. Tit for tat?, no shame on you!

    • Gunny G says:

      “your Congress?” You mean you’re not an American citizen? And you think that I was wrong about both parents needing to be US citizens? THAT IS FUNNY! Hey dumbass, try spell check and then get some windex to clean off the spit from your monitor from your screechings at my blog! haha.

    • Porcelain says:

      Yup we’re all financed by the Jews, I mean Koch brothers. Seriously though, if you think that foreign governments/corporations have too much power, we agree. Why do you think Democrats like H. Clinton want to disarm Americans, restrict free speech and abdicate American sovereignty to foreign law? When the government becomes rotten because of politicians pimping America out to lobby groups against American interests, the people should ‘rise up’ and that doesn’t mean closing this page as you seem to think.

    • Jeff says:

      3goldens: “…what some crack pot rights on a blog, probably in all likelihood financed by the Koch brothers, the billionaires who financed the entire Tea Party movement.”

      That about says it all and sums up your case. Prove Kock financed patriots Tea Party…. never mind…all you are interested in is crack pot conspiracies. You actually took the time to “”right””[sic] all that stuff?-without a stitch of fact or proof?

  6. Jeff says:


    I’ve come to the conclusion that “Fast and Furious” is a good euphemism for Zero’s entire agenda.

  7. Cindy says:

    Where are all the sheriffs? They could do this. They have the power to do this.

    • Gunny G says:

      You’re right there but I think at this point, they’re trying to protect their local citizens from the Feds! Sheriff Joe is running for reelection and he is investigating all of the frauds of Obama.

      I’d LOVE to see Obama visit, say, Arizona, and he is served with a subpeona or an arrest warrant. I’d PAY to see that.

  8. clyde says:

    Excellent post that I’m sure Ivan has already sent along to the FBI,who will get a good chuckle out of.

  9. Hardnox says:

    You pose some good questions and some really attractive scenarios.

    You shouldn’t tease your readers.

    Btw, Nancy Pelosi was the ONLY person to certify zero’s eligibility to be POTUS.

    • Gunny G says:


      Also, anyone who failed to raise a protest is guilty as well. Had it been President Gunny G, I personally would have arrested Waxman for his Code Pink gig. THAT, my brother, IS TREASON and during a time of war.

  10. Pepperhawk says:

    Great post. I’ve been giving this some thought the last several days since I was called a terrorist and trying to commence an insurrection against the government on John Boehner’s Face Book page the other day by a libturd. He also told me that he had taken screen shots of my comments and was sending them to the FBI with his criminal complaint against me. LOL! I told him go ahead, you don’t scare me one bit.

    So I got to thinking about this and it goes along with your post. We no longer have a Republic for all intent and purpose. Our 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments have been nullified by the TSA, Patriot Act, and the NDDA.

    Our 1rs Amendment rights are being taken away on a daily basis. We know coming down the road is the small arms treaty that Shrillary signed with the UN and will have to be ratified by the Senate. The Senate will never ratify that treaty. So the Kenyan King will issue an EO to ratify that treaty since he has basically disbanded Congress, which in itself is another impeachable offense.

    So, it’s my opinion that we can go back to the Declaration of Independence which states……Paragraph 2, ……”when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security……”

    So, in answer to your rhetorical question of “why should we obey the law”, I say we do not have to obey the law any further. The Republic has been overthrown already. We are now living under a dictatorship. Congress seems to have no spine to do the right thing and impeach everyone of these law breakers.

    Now it is our duty to overthrow it.

    Also, a link that may interest you and/or your other readers:
    This is in regard to the suit brought before the court in Georgia.

    • Gunny G says:


      No sweat on the libtard and the FBI. Ivan the Gobbler (and I ain’t talking turkey here) has been reporting me to the FBI on more than one occasion! haha. Until they arrest and charge half of Hollyweird, 1/4 of Congress, Occutards, Trumka, Piven, Stern, and Soros/Obama, to name a few, for calling for a violent leftist revolution, they can suck on it.

      Remember back in Sept 2010 when I posted, “The NEW Declaration of Independence?” I wrote it in October 2008 and will post it tomorrow. Funny how I was about 3 years AHEAD of the game.

      • Pepperhawk says:

        Ha, ha, that’s funny that Ivan the Terrible Libtard reported you on many occasions. Hilarious.

        Yeah, I recall your posting back then and I will look forward to reading it again.
        Go Gunny!

  11. Gunny G says:


    Exactly right. There is a reason why the Founders wanted a bona-fide American as President so that there would be no conflict of interest when it came to going after OUR interests FIRST!

  12. neoconxtreme says:

    The scenario you paint would never happen, Gunny. I don’t think you can find twelve citizens with the sack to sit on the jury. Sad to say, but I think America has accepted the interloper-in-chief as a legitimate citizen and don’t want to be ridiculed by the leftists and called names, so they avoid the subject.

    Granted, there are a few patriots who visit your site and other similar outlets who would serve, and God bless them every one, but the days of America standing up for what is right, regardless of where the chips may fall, are over in my opinion. The average Joe doesn’t think it worth the hassle of exposing the fraudster. They fear riots by government dependant drones who worship the interloper. Many of them ( drones ) have already stated publicly that they don’t care whether the interloper was here or Kenya, he ‘shares their values’.

    Godspeed to you and your followers, but I think it best we focus on rebuilding America in the vision expressed by the founders after the total collapse of the country brought about by the liberals and their never ending guilt complex.

    • Gunny G says:


      I agree that many Americans have been conditioned to shy away from calling it as they see it for fear of being called a name by the Left, I know a few of them and am working on getting them OUT of that mentality, but there are many of us who refuse to knuckle under.

      Remember that the revolution was fought with 33% of the population AGAINST us and another 33% sitting on the fence (moderates) and yet we won.

      I agree on the parasite class, they are definately an insider threat and are going to have to be dealt with one day or another.

      While I hope that we DO NOT collapse, I am preparing for the worst and hoping for the best.

      Great comment, thx.

      • 3goldens says:

        Threats of violation, noted and forwarded to federal investigators!

        • Gunny G says:

          Dear Nutjob,

          I’ve self-reported myself MANY TIMES to the FIRST snitch website your tin god Lord Barry put up. I then self-reported many time to the SECOND snitch site your fuerher put up, Attackwatch!

          BTW, did you report your fellow leftists like Francis Fox Piven for calling for a violent revolution? Trumka? Stern? Michael Mooreon?

  13. kitman3 says:

    Great post I too believe Obumbler is an illegal president while not being naturally born here of both Americans parents but I will say that my son was born in 1979 in Munich, Germany my ex-wife German and I got him a American citizenship born aboard status from the embassy there with no problem but as you point out he would not be a naturally born citizen because one parent was German and he has dual citizenship now.

Comments are closed.