Consider the following facts:
FACT: Obama admitted that his father was a Kenyan, a British subject.
FACT: Obama’s mother was, for the sake of argument, a US citizen, of age. (She was in fact, a minor, incapable of transferring US citizenship on Obama, based on the law then.
FACT: Both parents MUST be US citizens to confer US citizenship on a child AND the child MUST be born either in the US (native born) or on a US base OCONUS , i.e., McLame in a US Naval Hospital in the Canal Zone.
FACT: Obama is thus a dual citizen. UK subject plus US citizen = Dual Nationality. This cannot be denied.
FACT: Obama is an illegal President because he has dual citizenship and can never become a natural born citizen, simply because where one is born is a constant and cannot be changed, i.e., you may be born in California and live in Florida your whole life but the birth certificate will always reflect California.
FACT: Nancy Pelosi aided and abetted the election of an illegal President by refusing to demand that he prove his citizenship in a valid format and thus, violated the Constitution.
Consider the following scenario.
A group of patriots now consider the Obama Regime to be completely lawless with the recent usurpation of the Senate’s Constitutional power to confirm appointees and decide to act.
a. They observe that the Issa vs Holder Operation Fast and Furious sessions are little more than a dog and pony show.
b. They observe that the SCOTUS has refused to even examine the case of Obama’s birth certificate in 2008, fearful of race riots and/or a Constitutional crisis that they would have to deal with.
c. They observe that the ATF has acted unlawfully by enabling straw man buys in an operation that started under a Democrat controlled Congress.
d. They observe that ObamaKare was passed by a Democrat controlled Congress and it has been stated by Federal Judge Henry E. Hudson that the Federal government has no power “to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market.”
e. They observe that the US Government, led by a Democrat controlled Congress, is in clear violation of Article 4.4 which sets out in clear detail that the Federal government SHALL protect the separate states from invasion. Example: Arizona is under invasion by Mexican troops and illegals and vast tracts of US desert areas are trashed and considered either a biological hazard or a danger area due to criminal activity.
f. They observe that offering 6 billion dollars for “clunkers” is in clear violation of Articles 1.2 and 1.8 of the US Constitution.
g. They observe that Obama’s “czars” unlike in previous administrations, have cabinet-level authority, i.e., Cass Sunstein issuing regulations, without being vetted. That they are unelected policy and regulatory decision makers and this is in direct violation of Article 1.1 of the US Constitution that states only Congress can draft and enact laws.
h. They observe that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi endorsed the unconstitutional Fairness Doctrine stating in reply to Human Events reporter John Gizzi’s question: “Do you personally support revival of the ‘Fairness Doctrine?”, she [Nancy] replied “Yes.”
i. They observe that the Democrat controlled Congress did nothing when Obama took over as the Chairman of the UN Security Council.
j. They observe that the Democrat controlled Congress gave the 9/11 first responders money. This violates Article 1.8 of the US Constitution in that Congress can expend funds for the general welfare but not for individuals or special groups.
k. They observe that the Democrat controlled Congress attempted to regulate freedom of speech through Net Neutrality.
l. They observe that Nancy Pelosi is “glad” that President Obama violated the US Constitution, bypassing the Senate by appointing three people to the National Labor Relations Board and one to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
m. They observe that the Congress, led by Nancy Pelosi, declared that Article 1.8 of the US Constitution fell under the purview of Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce. However, they noted, one cannot buy insurance across state lines and therefore, insurance is not interstate commerce. Thus Congress lied, again.
o. They observe that ObamaKare violates the 10th Amendment because it coerces the separate states into complying with a Federal program that usurps state jurisdiction of the insurance industry within their states.
One day, Nancy Pelosi lands in her private jet and is escorted to her limo. She gets in. It pulls out, and the doors lock. A cell phone jammer is employed to keep her from calling out and the limo drives to a location not where she wanted to go. Henry Waxman also disappears.
A video appears on YouTube a week after the disappearance of Nancy Pelosi and Henry Waxman, uploaded from a public library terminal that was hacked into, showing their trial, for the above crimes against the American people, which occurred while Nancy was in charge of the Congress and Waxman voted for them. The video is in four parts, totaling six hours, with the judge and jury wearing masks. Pelosi defends herself but the evidence is overwhelming. She is sentenced to twenty-five years in a people’s prison and disappears from the face of the earth. All attempts to find her turn up nothing.
Henry Waxman faces an additional charge of Treason for aiding Code Pink in sending aid to the terrorists in Fallujah, in 2004, then engaged in battle against US Marines. He is sentenced to death by a firing squad and his corpse is dropped off in a body bag in the National Mall.
Barbara Boxer, Raul Grijalva, and Dennis Kucinich, all who helped Waxman in 2004, all surround themselves with more security.
Question: Is it okay to kidnap a traitor and try them and sentence them, using laws on the books as well as the US Constitution, by a people’s court, when there is no longer any rule of law in our government?
Question: If Obama, the leader of this nation, refuses to follow the Constitution, the Law of the Land, why are we bound to follow the law?
Question: If Eric Holder, the director of the DOJ routinely violates the law, commits perjury, destroys evidence, engaged in a subversion of the Constitution (Second Amendment), and refuses to prosecute crimes caught on video-tape, why are we bound to follow the law?
Question: If federal agencies like the ATF engage in a subversion of the Constitution (Second Amendment) and the TSA, who violates the 4th and 5th Amendments every day, do not follow the law of the land, why should we?
WANTED MARINES DEAD FOR POLITICAL REASONS
LINK TO WAXMAN’S LETTER: http://www.adaptitech.com/incoming/Waxman%20Letter.pdf
“The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.” T. Jefferson.